MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415010113 · doi:10.1177/26334895251385936

Intervention Activities and Implementation Strategies for School-Based Health Promotion: Identifying Core Functions and Forms to Facilitate Scale-up of an Effective Intervention

2025· article· en· W4415010113 on OpenAlexaff
Julia Dabravolskaj, Jodi Kalubi, Julia E. Moore, Boshra A. Mandour, Camila Honorato, Paul J. Veugelers, Katerina Maximova

Bibliographic record

VenueImplementation Research and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Health promotionContext (archaeology)Public healthCore (optical fiber)DisadvantagedCore competencyVariety (cybernetics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: School-based health promotion is a key public health strategy to reduce disease burden and health inequalities. School-based interventions with local evidence of effectiveness need to be scaled up to maximize their benefits. A Project Promoting healthy Living for Everyone in Schools (APPLE Schools) is a health promoting school (HPS) intervention that targets schools in disadvantaged settings and has been shown to be effective in promoting children's healthy lifestyle behaviors and reducing health inequalities. To support its scale-up, we aimed to identify core functions (basic purposes driving intervention's effectiveness) and forms (specific content and delivery strategies implemented to achieve core functions). Method: We extracted 5,301 action items from 191 annual action plans written between 2011 and 2021 in 70 APPLE Schools. We followed an implementation science approach and used supervised machine learning algorithms to classify 2,683 unique action items into intervention activities and implementation strategies. Core functions were drawn from theoretical frameworks; forms were identified through thematic analysis. Results: We identified 55 forms and mapped them to 17 core functions of intervention activities and implementation strategies. The most common core functions of intervention activities were enablement (96%), modeling (66%), and education (54%); the most common core functions of implementation strategies were relational and organizational support context (86%), partnerships and networking (84%), student participation (78%), and professional development and learning (73%). The remaining core functions were identified in <50% of the schools. Forms included a broad range of activities, with a greater variety of those that addressed the most common core functions. Conclusions: We created matrices of core functions and forms of intervention activities and implementation strategies to inform the successful scale-up of APPLE Schools, an effective and cost-effective HPS intervention. These matrices can be used as a guide to improving existing HPS interventions and scaling them up to new settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.058
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0580.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.386
GPT teacher head0.660
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImplementation Research and PracticeSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207