Estimation of the Coupling Constants for the Strong Interaction in the Framework of the Electromagnetic Bridge Theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A theoretical prediction of the strong coupling constant  based on a non-perturbative framework derived from Bridge Theory (BT) application is presented, in which strong interactions emerge from electromagnetic dipole interactions (DEMS) between fractional charges. Without relying on Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) or renormalization group formalism, we derive a functional expression for  as a function of energy scale , based on the spatial and energetic configuration of quark interactions. The resulting function exhibits asymptotic freedom at high energies and yields values of  in close agreement with experimental data in the 91–4000 GeV range. The predicted behaviour matches the experimental running of  across various particle production channels, including , , and heavy boson processes. The model provides a geometric interpretation of strong coupling as an emergent electromagnetic effect governed by the local structure of the dipole system, avoiding the need for additional gauge fields. These results suggest that the strong coupling constant may derive from universal interaction principles and that strong force dynamics could be reinterpreted within an electromagnetic framework. The method is fully predictive and does not rely on fitted parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".