MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415018120 · doi:10.1007/s10291-025-01965-y

First smartwatch RTK results: performance analysis of instantaneous, single-frequency multi-GNSS cm-level positioning with comparison to Google Pixel 5 smartphones

2025· article· en· W4415018120 on OpenAlex
Phyo C Thu, Robert Odolinski, Chien Zheng Yong, Baocheng Zhang, Hongzhou Yang, Sean Barbeau, Mohammed Khider, G. L. Leonard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGPS Solutions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Otago
KeywordsSmartwatchGNSS applicationsReal Time KinematicMultipath propagationGlobal Positioning SystemKinematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the potential of Android-based smartwatch real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning using single-frequency, multi Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) observations, including the L1 GPS, E1 Galileo, B1 BDS and L1 QZSS signals. We evaluate the instantaneous (single-epoch), single-frequency, single-baseline RTK performance under three conditions: (1) zero-baseline with external antenna, (2) short-baseline with external antennas, and (3) short-baseline with internal antennas, all under a stationary setup configuration. The benefit of using the instantaneous RTK model is that it is insensitive to cycle slips. We analyze the smartwatch-to-smartwatch single baseline RTK performance in Dunedin, New Zealand using 4 h of data with a one second measurement interval. No geodetic station is involved in this study, as one of the smartwatches serves as the base station. The tested smartwatches include the Google Pixel Watch 1 (GW1) and the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 (SW6) that can only collect single-frequency data, and we compare the RTK performance to that of Google Pixel 5 (GP5) smartphones. While using external Trimble Zephyr 2 antennas for the GW1 and SW6 smartwatches, we achieved centimeter-level positioning precisions, with instantaneous integer least squares (ILS) success rates (SR) exceeding 99% for both the zero- and short-baseline data. We found that the RTK performance of both smartwatches is competitive with that of the GP5 smartphones. We also demonstrate that using the internal antennas of the smartwatches results in higher sensitivity to potential multipath effects and poorer GNSS signal quality, thereby reducing the RTK positioning performance. Most importantly, we have shown, for the first time, that one of the smartwatch models can achieve cm-level RTK positioning with a remarkable instantaneous ILS SR exceeding 99% over 4 h of data using the internal smartwatch antennas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it