Quarter Life Crisis pada Dewasa Muda: Peran Orientasi Ekspektasi Masa Depan dan Keberfungsian Keluarga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the influence of future expectation orientation and family functioning on quarter-life crisis among young adults in Karawang Regency. The research employs a quantitative method with a causal design. Participants consist of 204 young adults aged 18 to 25 years residing in Karawang Regency, comprising 71 males and 133 females. Sampling was conducted using the convenience sampling technique. Data collection utilized three psychological scales: the Quarter Life Crisis Scale, the Education and Work Future Expectation Scale, and the Family Function Scale. Data analysis techniques included normality test, linearity test, multiple regression analysis, and categorization test. The results indicate that future expectation orientation and family functioning significantly influence quarter-life crisis among young adults in Karawang Regency. The combined influence of future expectation orientation and family functioning on quarter-life crisis is 3.9%, with the remaining variance attributed to other unexamined factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".