MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2025· article· en· W4415032830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceContext (archaeology)Automotive industryKey (lock)Satellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2025 5th International Conference on Computer, Remote Sensing and Aerospace (CRSA 2025) was convened in Jinan, China, from August 22 to 24, 2025. Since its inception, the CRSA conference series has been dedicated to promoting international exchange and collaboration in cutting-edge fields such as computer science, remote sensing technology, and aerospace engineering, establishing itself as a highly influential academic platform in these domains. Building upon the successful experiences and academic traditions of the previous four conferences, CRSA 2025 focused on the latest findings, technological breakthroughs, and future directions in mechanical, aerospace and automotive engineering. The conference aimed to provide an open, inclusive, and efficient environment for leading academics, researchers, and industry professionals to engage in in-depth dialogue and collaboration. In the context of rapid technological advancement, interdisciplinary integration has become a key driver of innovation in areas such as intelligent sensing, image processing, and manned/unmanned aviation. CRSA 2025 centered on these hot topics through diverse formats, including keynote speeches delivered by renowned experts: • Prof. Guisong Xia from Wuhan University, China: “AI4Geo: from Image Measurement to Geo-spatial Intelligence”. • Prof. Bin Zou from Central South University, China: “Practical Applications and Prospects of Remote Sensing for Heavy Metal Pollution Monitoring”. • Prof. Qingsheng Zeng from Universite du Quebec en Outaouais (UQO), Canada: “Analysis and Design of Lightweight, High-Efficiency, and Circularly Polarized Antennas for Satellite Platforms”. • Prof. Lu Leng from Nanchang Hangkong University, China: “Some New Findings about Security and Privacy of AI Systems”. List of Committee Member is available in this PDF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207