MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415035839 · doi:10.13139/olcf/2530508

SST-TG-P1F4R3200: Decaying Stably-Stratified Turbulence (SST), Initialized Using Taylor-Green Vortices (TG) at Prandtl Number Pr=1, Froude Number Fr=4, Reynolds Number Re=3200

2025· dataset· en· W4415035839 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen M. de Bruyn Kops, James J. Riley, Miles M. P. Couchman, Muralikrishnan Gopalakrishnan Meena

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReynolds numberTurbulenceVortexFroude numberPrandtl numberVortex sheddingFlow (mathematics)Binary number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset comprises direct numerical simulations (DNS) of decaying stably-stratified turbulence influenced by a linear background density gradient, initialized using an array of Taylor-Green vortices, as described in [Riley & de Bruyn Kops (2003)](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1578077). The initial Prandtl, Froude, and Reynolds numbers are (Pr, Fr, Re) = (1, 4, 3200). A total of 15,000 snapshots are recorded at uniform time intervals, each with a spatial resolution of 512x512x256 grid points. Four flow variables are associated with each snapshot: the three velocity components (u,v,w) and the perturbed density field (rho) away from the background gradient. All fields are stored in binary format (32-bit little-endian), each with a size of 255 MB, yielding a total dataset size of 15.3 TB. Further details are referenced in the attached README file, and a current list of publications and associated analysis tools are provided at https://stratified-turbulence.github.io/web/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207