MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415043018 · doi:10.1002/jcd.22011

On the Q‐Polynomial Property of Bipartite Graphs Admitting a Uniform Structure

2025· article· en· W4415043018 on OpenAlexaff
Blas Fernández, Roghayeh Maleki, Štefko Miklavič, Giusy Monzillo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Designs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFinite Group Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersMinistrstvo za Izobraževanje, Znanost in ŠportJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
KeywordsAdjacency matrixBipartite graphVertex (graph theory)DiagonalAdjacency listComplete bipartite graphDiagonal matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Let denote a finite, connected graph with vertex set . Fix and let denote the eccentricity of . For mutually distinct scalars define a diagonal matrix as follows: for we let , where denotes the shortest path length distance function of . We say that is a dual adjacency matrix candidate of with respect to if the adjacency matrix of and satisfy for some scalars . Assume now that is uniform with respect to in the sense of Terwilliger [Coding theory and design theory, Part I, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 20 , 193–212 (1990)]. In this paper, we give sufficient conditions on the uniform structure of , such that admits a dual adjacency matrix candidate with respect to . As an application of our results, we show that the full bipartite graphs of dual polar graphs are ‐polynomial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Combinatorial DesignsSame topicFinite Group Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207