MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415045362 · doi:10.7202/1118974ar

Une machine qui pense comme moi

2024· article· fr· W4415045362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Servanne Monjour, Anne Savelli

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Identity (music)Relation (database)Subject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autrice de dix-sept ouvrages (publiés, entre autres, chez La Marelle, Le Mot et le reste, Publie.net…), Anne Savelli a investi des espaces d’expression alternatifs depuis de nombreuses années : on peut la lire sur son site web, Fenêtre Open Space , mais également sur Remue.net , on peut l’écouter sur la web radio L’aiR Nu, ou plus récemment sur Patreon, on peut également la suivre sur les réseaux sociaux. Dans cet entretien, elle revient sur son parcours et sur le lien qui se tisse entre sa pratique littéraire et les technologies d’écriture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.012
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.351
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.013 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207