Bibliographic record
Abstract
François Bon fut et demeure un précurseur des activités littéraires sur le Net. Il n’a cependant pas cessé de publier des livres imprimés, dont certains antérieurement parus sur son site Internet. Une telle pratique offre la possibilité de confronter les caractéristiques respectives de ces ouvrages selon le support qui les accueille. À partir de Tumulte , d’ Autobiographie des objets et de leur matérialité éditoriale et de leur configuration particulière sur le site de l’écrivain, la présente communication confronte le texte aux notions de d’hypertextualité et de circumtextualité. Elle fait apparaître les modifications de lecture que cela induit. Elle observe que l’édition numérique absorbe le temps et favorise une quintuple dissolution des limites livresques, mais pointe aussi la disparition qui menace le texte virtuel et manifeste enfin la mélancolie indissolublement liée au développement d’un régime numérique des livres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".