Phase-dependent quantum optical coherence tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two-photon interference is a cornerstone of quantum optics, enabling imaging, sensing, and precision measurements that surpass classical limits. By harnessing the quantum interference of photon pairs, as demonstrated by the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect, this approach offers superior axial resolution and intrinsic dispersion cancellation, along with strong noise suppression arising from the precise temporal correlations between photons. Building on these principles, we present the theoretical framework and experimental realization of phase-dependent quantum optical coherence tomography (QOCT), a technique that employs phase-modulated two-photon interference for noninvasive morphological analysis of multilayered samples. We demonstrate that introducing controlled phase shifts to photon pairs in a Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer effectively eliminates artifacts caused by reflections at different sample layers, thereby greatly improving the accuracy and reliability of QOCT measurements. This work advances the fundamental understanding and practical deployment of two-photon interference, overcoming a key limitation in applying QOCT to real-world applications such as biomedical imaging and materials characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".