Frequency Restoration and Modality Enforcement towards Resisting-corruption Multimodal Sentiment Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA), previous methods concentrate on designing sophisticated fusion strategies and performing representation learning across heterogeneous modalities, aiming to leverage multimodal signals to detect human sentiment. However, these approaches fail to address the long-standing issue of corrupted modal details in videos, which may be caused by the challenge of the excessive loss of emotionally relevant semantics resulted from the degradation of detailed information. In this work, we aim to improve the robustness capacity of resisting corruption in MSA, by introducing a Hierarchical Frequency Restoration and Adaptive Modality Enforcement (HFR-AME) approach. The HFR-AME progressively recovers blurred detailed cues in each modality while enhancing the discriminative power of modal representations. Specifically, to reconstruct distinct frequency band features, we propose to equip the HFR module with a key component called the Frequency Multimodal UNet (FM-UNet), so as to utilize complementary modal features as conditions. This meticulous restoration process, performed from low to high frequency, facilitates the comprehensive recovery of intricate details. Meanwhile, to adaptively integrate these diverse frequency features, we introduce the AME module to enhance the beneficial modal frequencies while suppressing irrelevant ones, with the goal of strengthening the restored modal representations. Extensive experiments show our HFR-AME outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the CMU-MOSI and CMU-MOSEI datasets, improving 7-class accuracy by 0.5% and 0.6%, respectively. Further analysis also confirms its cross-lingual generalization and competitive computational efficiency. Our code is made available at https://github.com/nianhua20/HFR-AME .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".