MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415047729 · doi:10.1109/icjece.2025.3601732

Design and Evaluation of PM Vernier Machine for Urban Air Mobility Propulsion Applications

2025· article· en· W4415047729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionTorqueVernier scaleStatorPower (physics)Torque densityTakeoff

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For aircraft propulsion motors, the torque and power density requirements are highly demanding and beyond what is currently achievable. This article intends to thoroughly examine the feasibility of a surface PM vernier machine (SPMVM) for electrical vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) applications, where very high specific torque (torque per mass) is required. It was shown that, in contrast to conventional PM machines, the performance of SPMVM is quite sensitive to certain design parameters, including stator slot geometry and PM dimensions. The implications of various design characteristics of SPMVM are discussed, which ultimately guides the necessary design philosophy in order to attain higher specific torque levels as well as improved power factor. The achievable specific torque, efficiency, and power factor were also shown to vary with the choice of the slot–pole combination. Following the outlined design guidelines, two DD SPMVMs featuring distinct slot–pole combinations have been designed, together with a conventional PM machine serving as a reference model, all rated at 204 kW at 1300 r/min. A comprehensive comparison of the electromagnetic performance between the designed SPMVMs and the reference model is presented. The designed SPMVMs can attain a specific torque of approximately 50 Nm/kg, nearly double the specific torque obtainable from a conventional PM machine. To further assess the feasibility of the designed SPMVMs, a thermal analysis of the designed machines is also conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it