Release the Potential of Memory Buffer in Continual Learning: A Dynamic System Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Continual learning (CL) focuses on learning non-stationary data distribution without forgetting previous knowledge. The most widely used memory-replay approaches are often prone to memory overfitting due to the limited memory diversity and hardness. Existing work mitigating memory overfitting either lacks data diversity or hardness or is hard to train. To address the above limitations and release the memory buffer potential, we view the memory buffer transformation from a new dynamic system perspective and propose a continuous and reversible memory transformation method. We introduce an adversarial optimization objective that jointly learns the CL model and memory transformer. Specifically, we present a deterministic continuous memory transformer (DCMT) to generate diverse memory data. Furthermore, we inject uncertainty into the transformation function and develop a stochastic continuous memory transformer (SCMT), which substantially enhances the diversity of the transformed memory buffer. The presented neural transformation approaches have significant advantages over existing ones: (1) they significantly increase the memory buffer diversity and hardness to overfit; (2) they are memory efficient without needing to make a replica of the memory data. Extensive experiments show a significant improvement with our approach compared to strong baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".