MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415051994 · doi:10.34925/eip.2025.181.8.003

ОПЫТ РАЗВИТЫХ СТРАН В УПРАВЛЕНИИ МУНИЦИПАЛЬНЫМИ ИНВЕСТИЦИЯМИ

2025· article· ru· W4415051994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueЭкономика и предпринимательство · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Economy and Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban agglomerationTransparency (behavior)General partnershipSamaraAdaptation (eye)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статья посвящена анализу опыта развитых стран в управлении муниципальными инвестициями, направленного на преодоление территориальной асимметрии и цифрового разрыва. На примере Франции, Канады (кейс Metro Vancouver) и Финляндии выявлены ключевые модели: государственно-частное партнёрство (ГЧП), межмуниципальное сотрудничество и цифровизация. Исследование показало, что успех ГЧП зависит от прозрачности распределения рисков, межмуниципальные ассоциации эффективны при чёткой координации и экологической направленности проектов, а цифровые платформы требуют параллельных инвестиций в обучение кадров. Особое внимание уделено проблеме концентрации инвестиций в агломерациях (на примере Самарской области) и способам её решения через адаптацию зарубежных практик. Для регионов с выраженной асимметрией предложены рекомендации: внедрение ГЧП с фокусом на «зелёные» технологии, создание межмуниципальных объединений для периферии и интеграция AI-аналитики с программами цифровой грамотности. Результаты исследования актуальны для оптимизации инвестиционных стратегий в условиях глобальных вызовов, таких как урбанизация и климатические изменения. The article analyzes the experience of developed countries in managing municipal investments aimed at overcoming territorial asymmetry and the digital divide. Using the example of France, Canada (the Metro Vancouver case) and Finland, key models have been identified: public-private partnership (PPP), inter-municipal cooperation and digitalization. The study showed that the success of PPPs depends on transparency in risk allocation, inter-municipal associations are effective with clear coordination and environmental focus of projects, and digital platforms require parallel investments in personnel training. Special attention is paid to the problem of concentration of investments in agglomerations (using the example of the Samara region) and ways to solve it through the adaptation of foreign practices. For regions with pronounced asymmetry, recommendations are proposed: the introduction of PPPs with a focus on "green" technologies, the creation of inter-municipal associations for the periphery, and the integration of AI analytics with digital literacy programs. The results of the study are relevant for optimizing investment strategies in the face of global challenges such as urbanization and climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it