MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415053256 · doi:10.37256/jeee.4220257851

Dynamic Simulation of a DC Microgrid for a Remote Community in Ghana

2025· article· en· W4415053256 on OpenAlexafffund
Godfred Atinkum, M. Tariq Iqbal, John E. Quaicoe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicrogridPhotovoltaic systemDynamic simulationWind powerMaximum power point trackingSizingTransient (computer programming)Electric power systemEnergy storagePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microgrids are a growing solution for providing sustainable energy to remote communities. However, the complex mix of different sources requires careful analysis of their behavior over time. This paper presents dynamic modeling and simulation of a DC microgrid for a remote Ghanaian community. The system integrates a photovoltaic system, a wind generation system, a diesel generator, power converters, and a battery energy storage system, all of which are connected to a common DC bus. Component selection and system sizing were performed in Homer Pro. A detailed component-level model of the system is developed using MATLAB/Simulink to capture its transient behavior. Two maximum power point tracking techniques are used to optimize power extraction from the PV and wind generation systems, respectively. Simulated results include the responses observed for the components' voltage, current, and power waveforms under varying solar irradiation, wind, and changing load conditions. The dynamic simulations demonstrate effective voltage regulation, load adaptability, and system stability in response to changes in solar irradiance, wind speeds, and load changes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Electronics and Electrical EngineeringSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207