MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415053970 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107599

Harnessing machine learning for rapid and cost-efficient 3D geometry generation in neighborhood energy modeling

2025· article· en· W4415053970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkEnergy modelingMemory footprintFootprintSegmentationEfficient energy use3D city modelsImage processingArtificial neural networkRanging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and scalable 3D building stock modeling is essential for reliable energy modeling, urban planning, and the design of sustainable, net-zero communities. This study introduces an automated method that generates 3D building models with minimal computational resources using OpenStreetMap footprints and street view images. The approach integrates image processing with machine learning techniques, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), Faster R-CNN, and semantic segmentation networks (SSN), from limited input data, one footprint and four façade images per building. Validation against manual measurements demonstrates an average volume accuracy of 95%, while modeling times are reduced from 3,600–19,800 s (manual process) to 458–466 s. Furthermore, energy simulations based on these models show reasonable agreement with energy audits, with variations ranging from 0.6% to 8.9%. The novelty of this work lies in its ability to combine open data sources, discrete methods and ML-based image processing for rapid, cost-effective, and interoperable 3D stock modeling. This framework accelerates large-scale digital twin development and supports integration with open BIM standards for construction and facility management. • ML techniques streamline urban digital twin creation for sustainable cities. • Method focused on low computational cost and modeling time reduction. • Automated geometry modeling using ML for building stock energy modeling. • Adaptable method supports various detail levels in geometric data collection. • Integration of various imaging datasets for detailed energy modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it