MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415054267 · doi:10.1088/2752-5309/ae11ce

Integrating climate services into health systems for nutrition security: a scoping review

2025· article· en· W4415054267 on OpenAlexaff
Bianca Carducci, Georgia Dominguez, Jessica Fanzo

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersEleanor Crook Foundation
KeywordsClimate changePsychological interventionExtreme weatherPovertyFood securityPublic healthGlobal healthDeveloping country

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Climate information services (CISs) are science-based tools used to inform decision-making in climate-sensitive sectors, such as agriculture, water resources, energy, disaster risk reduction and health. These CISs rely on high-quality climate and weather data in order to predict and prepare for specific extreme weather or climate events such as droughts and floods. Within the health sector, most CISs have been developed to prevent and treat specific infectious diseases or food insecurity; however less is known on how CISs have been used for nutrition programming. We conducted a scoping review of available evidence, on the use of CISs to implement direct and indirect nutrition interventions in health-care and other sectors ahead of extreme weather or climate events. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, and grey literature sources for primary studies (observational, intervention, and program evaluations) conducted in low- and middle-income countries from 1 January 2000 to 1 April 2024. We included 48 studies, representing 67 country-level programs. The majority of programs were found in the African region ( n = 38), followed by South-East Asian Region ( n = 10), Region of the Americas ( n = 9), Western Pacific Region ( n = 8), Eastern Mediterranean Region ( n = 1), and the European Region ( n = 1). Most CISs were developed in response to vector-borne diseases (17 countries), droughts (10 countries), floods (9 countries) or multi-hazards (11 countries). The types of nutrition programs deployed were largely outside of the health sector using social protection schemes or vector control including poverty alleviation ( n = 49 programs), water, sanitation and hygiene ( n = 24 programs), disease prevention ( n = 23 programs) or emergency nutrition ( n = 19 programs). Few studies evaluated impacts of CISs on the nutritional status of women, children and adolescents affected by climate events. There is urgency and opportunity for better integration of weather and climate information into health systems decision-making and workforce preparedness at local levels to improve both short- and long-term nutrition outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.590
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research HealthSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207