MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415056368 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2025.27686

Timely, Connected and Person-Centred: How the Integrated interRAI Reporting System Is Supporting Senior Care in Canada

2025· article· en· W4415056368 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHealthcare Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Health Information
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStandardizationBenchmark (surveying)Health informaticsBest practiceHealth careLong-term careElderly care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Integrated interRAI Reporting System (IRRS) supports timely, connected and person-centred senior care in Canada. IRRS enables system-to-system communication and near real-time data submission for the home care and long-term care sectors. It houses new interRAI data standards that offer improved commonality and standardization of language. With IRRS, users can explore organizational-level data, compare results across jurisdictions and see trends over time in a dynamic and user-friendly interactive business intelligence tool. IRRS will better support the sectors' ability to respond to emerging pan-Canadian needs to analyze, benchmark and compare data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicHealthcare Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207