MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415059016 · doi:10.1016/j.engreg.2025.09.001

Immunomodulating red blood cell coating for mitigation of foreign body reactions

2025· article· en· W4415059016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineered Regeneration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMcGill University
KeywordsInflammationFibrosisCoatingImmune systemMacrophage polarizationIn vivoHyaluronic acidMacrophage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A living RBCs coating was fabricated upon PDMS substrate by using HA as a bridging polymer. • PDMS-HA-RBC implant revealed the minimum fibrosis formation compared to pristine PDMS and PDMS-HA implants. • PDMS-HA-RBC sample induced original macrophages to translate more to M2 sub-phenotype and meanwhile less to M1 sub-phenotype. • RBCs coating-mediated macrophage polarizations were probably attributed to the presence of immune escape antigens (such as CD47 and CD59) upon the cell coating. Chronic inflammation of biomedical implants usually leads to fibrosis and device malfunction in the long term. To address these issues, a cell-crosslinked coating of red blood cells (RBCs) was developed to imitate a self-friendly biological membrane and camouflage the implants from immune system. Using the widely applied poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) as a model substrate, a natural polymer hyaluronic acid (HA) layer was constructed upon PDMS (PDMS-HA), which was further decorated with RBCs (PDMS-HA-RBC). Compared to pristine PDMS, both PDMS-HA and PDMS-HA-RBC notably polarized the original macrophages into an anti-inflammatory phenotype (M2) rather than a pro-inflammatory phenotype (M1). Especially, PDMS-HA-RBC exhibited the highest M2/M1 ratios of macrophages, suggesting efficient modulation effects of inflammation reactions by the RBCs coating. Moreover, in vivo results found that PDMS induced considerable foreign body reactions (FBRs) and extensive fibrosis formation. In contrast, PDMS-HA revealed a significantly thinner fibrotic layer while PDMS-HA-RBC induced the least amount of fibrosis. In addition, PDMS-HA-RBC exhibited the highest fluorescent intensity of CD206 (M2 antigen) and the lowest fluorescent intensity of CD86 (M1 antigen). It was speculated that the RBCs coating-mediated macrophage polarization was mainly attributed to the presence of immune escape antigens (such as CD47 and CD59) upon the cell coating. Altogether, our living RBCs coating demonstrated significant potentials in mitigating FBRs of PDMS, indicating their promising applications in surface engineering of various biomedical implants. The designed RBCs coating, which is living and exhibits more advantages than their membrane fragments, owns a plenty of immune-escape membrane proteins, such as CD47 and CD59, which could actively communiacte with macrophages and thus manipulate the polarization of macrophages to M2 sub-phenotype and inhibit fibrosis formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it