MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415068738 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.09.681528

Methane Cycling Microbes are Important Predictors of Methylmercury Accumulation in Rice Paddies

2025· preprint· en· W4415068738 on OpenAlexafffund
Rui Zhang, Alexandre J. Poulain, Qiang Pu, Jiang Liu, Mahmoud A. Abdelhafiz, Xinbin Feng, Bo Meng, Daniel S. Grégoire

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMethylmercuryMercury (programming language)Paddy fieldCyclingMethanotrophRhizosphereMicrobial population biologyNitrogen cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Microbial production of methylmercury from inorganic mercury in rice paddies poses health risks to consumers of this essential dietary staple. Although mercury-methylating communities are well characterized, the microbial guilds contributing to methylmercury accumulation in rice paddies remain unclear. Here, we collected paddy soils across a mercury concentration gradient throughout the rice growing season to identify microbial and environmental factors influencing methylmercury dynamics. We show that hgcA gene abundance, the key gene required for methylation, was not a significant predictor of methylmercury concentration in paddy soils. We also show that merB gene abundance correlated with methylmercury in mercury-polluted rhizosphere samples. Methane cycling genes were actively expressed, and their beta-diversity was significantly associated with methylmercury levels. Methanogen abundance correlated with higher methylmercury under elevated total mercury concentrations. Analysis of the methanotroph-associated mbnT gene, implicated in demethylation, revealed an unexpected positive correlation with methylmercury. Multiple regression and machine learning models converged on mercury bioavailability and methanogen/methanotroph abundances as key predictors of methylmercury, with methanogen-associated hgcA gene abundance and methanogen-methanotroph interactions highlighted under flooded, low-redox conditions. These findings suggest that methane-cycling microbes play key roles in methylmercury cycling dynamics and point to management strategies that could simultaneously mitigate mercury pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Importance Methylmercury is a microbially-derived neurotoxin that accumulates in rice, which is a global food staple. Predicting mercury’s fate in rice paddies is challenging because of the interplay between microbes responsible for methylmercury cycling and variables that control mercury availability. Our study coupled genomic and geochemical measurements with machine learning to identify the key predictors of methylmercury accumulation in paddy soils. We demonstrate that methanogen and methanotroph abundance, and mercury bioavailability, are major predictors of methylmercury variability in paddies. We show that considering interactions between methane cycling guilds improves our capacity to predict methylmercury accumulation in soils compared to approaches that rely solely on mercury cycling genes. This work can inform remediation strategies for mercury in rice paddies but also wetlands and permafrost where methane and mercury cycling are tightly coupled. Such strategies could provide a solution to simultaneously mitigate methylmercury exposure and reduce greenhouse gas emissions amid global environmental change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→