MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415069464 · doi:10.1080/11926422.2025.2530596

From diplomacy to trade: advancing Mi’kmaw sovereignty and economic prosperity

2025· article· en· W4415069464 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Foreign Policy Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityDiplomacySovereigntyEconomic diplomacyGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper looks at how the Mi'kmaw Nation can grow stronger by being part of trade and business. It explains that real reconciliation means more than apologies—it means respecting Mi'kmaw rights and letting Mi'kmaw people lead in areas like trade and the economy. The paper shares examples like the Mi'kmaw communities buying part of Clearwater Seafoods. It also calls on Canada to follow treaties, include Indigenous voices in trade decisions, and support Mi'kmaw businesses. True reconciliation will happen when the Mi'kmaw Nation is treated as an equal partner in Canada and the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Foreign Policy JournalSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207