MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415071690 · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2025.10.028

Modern definitions of periungual pigmentation (Hutchinson sign): Results of an expert opinion consensus conference

2025· article· en· W4415071690 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Eckart Haneke, Adam I. Rubin, Marcel C. Pasch, Fatih Göktay, Matilde Iorizzo, Michela Starace, Josette André, Robert Baran, G Cannata, Soumiya Chiheb, O. Cogrel, Osvaldo Correia, C. Ralph Daniel, Nilton Di Chiacchio, Eran Galili, Chander Grover, Nilton Gióia Di Chiacchio, Mark Holzberg, Nathaniel J. Jellinek, Severin Läuchli, Dong Youn Lee, Blanca Garrido Martín, Alexandre Michalany, I. Moulonguet, Je‐Ho Mun, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Phoebe Rich, Bertrand Richert, Dimitrios Rigopoulos, Avner Shemer, Archana Singal, Anita Takwale, Antonellá Tosti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicmelanin and skin pigmentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of MiamiSamsungCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BordeauxUniversità di BolognaSeoul National UniversityTel Aviv UniversityEmory UniversitySungkyunkwan UniversityFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyCollege of Medicine, Seoul National UniversitySchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityUniversité Hassan II de CasablancaFaculdade de Medicina do ABCLeonard M. Miller School of MedicineRadboud UniversiteitUniversity of MiamiYork UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensInselspital, Universitätsspital BernRadboud Universitair Medisch CentrumBrown University
KeywordsExpert opinionConsensus conferenceSecond opinionMEDLINEAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.157
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.117
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1570.117
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0080.005
Research integrity0.0090.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Academy of DermatologySame topicmelanin and skin pigmentationFrench-language works237,207