The Association of Acute Kidney Injury with the Development and Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) is rising globally, representing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Historically considered a transient and fully reversible condition, a substantial body of evidence now suggests that an episode of AKI is a major independent risk factor for adverse long-term sequelae, most notably the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review aims to synthesize and critically appraise the current evidence from observational cohort studies to quantify the long-term risks associated with AKI. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify cohort studies published from inception to September 2025 that evaluated long-term outcomes in adult patients following an episode of AKI, with a non-AKI comparator group. Studies were selected based on predefined Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design (PICOS) criteria, requiring a minimum follow-up of one year. Data on study design, population characteristics, definitions of AKI and CKD, follow-up duration, and reported outcomes were systematically extracted. The methodological quality and risk of bias for each included study were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results: Seventeen cohort studies, encompassing a total of 2,546,812 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The evidence consistently demonstrated that patients who survive an episode of AKI have a significantly higher risk of adverse long-term outcomes compared to those without AKI. The pooled adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for developing incident CKD was 2.72 (95% CI 2.01–3.69). The risk for progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was even more pronounced, with a pooled adjusted HR of 4.15 (95% CI 2.58–6.67). Furthermore, AKI was associated with a nearly doubled risk of long-term all-cause mortality (pooled adjusted HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.65–2.08). The risk for all outcomes was graded, increasing with the severity and duration of the initial AKI episode. Notably, even mild (Stage 1) or transient (<3 days) AKI was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident CKD. Other significant adverse outcomes included increased risks of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and recurrent AKI. Discussion: The synthesized evidence robustly demonstrates that AKI is not merely a transient event but a sentinel insult that can initiate a persistent trajectory toward chronic disease and premature death. The pathophysiological transition from AKI to CKD is driven by complex processes of maladaptive repair, including persistent inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, cellular senescence, and ultimately, renal fibrosis. These findings challenge the conventional clinical paradigm of "renal recovery" based solely on the normalization of serum creatinine and highlight a critical need for structured, long-term surveillance of AKI survivors. Conclusion: AKI is a potent and independent risk factor for the development of incident CKD, the progression of pre-existing CKD, ESRD, and premature mortality. Survivors of an AKI episode represent a high-risk population that warrants systematic, long-term nephrological follow-up to monitor for and mitigate these adverse cardiorenal outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.073 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".