MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415082034 · doi:10.3171/2025.6.jns241972

Assessment of auditory pathway microstructure in vestibular schwannoma patients: a quantitative diffusion tensor tractography study

2025· article· en· W4415082034 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aisha Halawani, Sarasa Tohyama, Pascale Tsai, Rana Barake, Fatemeh Hassannia, Mark Bernstein, Suneil K. Kalia, Gelareh Zadeh, Michael D. Cusimano, Michael L. Schwartz, David J. Mikulis, Normand Laperrière, John Rutka, Mojgan Hodaie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreToronto Western HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreOntario Brain Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusion MRIWhite matterVestibular systemTractographyAuditory pathwaysSchwannomaQuantitative assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Vestibular schwannomas (VSs) are cerebellopontine angle tumors that can result in cranial nerve dysfunction, most commonly sensorineural hearing loss. Conventional structural MRI is unable to provide correlative information on cranial nerve function. In this study, the authors used multitensor tractography to study the white matter microstructural properties of the auditory neural pathway as a correlate of cranial nerve function in a cohort of VS patients. They evaluated the relationship between the auditory neural pathway microstructural properties using pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and the speech discrimination score (SDS). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 258 patients with VS treated at the Toronto Western Hospital Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Unit was conducted. Of these, 3T MR images were analyzed for 57 surgically naive patients with unilateral VS who had preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and PTA and SDS results. Patients were excluded if they had bilateral tumors, previous surgical treatment (Gamma Knife radiosurgery or resection), or did not undergo DTI. DTI-derived metrics (fractional anisotropy [FA], radial diffusivity [RD], axial diffusivity [AD], and mean diffusivity [MD]) of five regions of interest positioned along the auditory neural pathway (ipsilateral superior olivary nucleus [SON] and trapezoid body [TB] and contralateral inferior colliculus, lateral lemniscus [LL], and medial geniculate body [MGB]) were measured bilaterally in all subjects. The diffusion metrics were correlated with quantitative average high-frequency (4000 and 8000 Hz) PTA and SDS results. RESULTS: Salient areas of neuroanatomical correlation included the LL and SON (affected side), where a statistically significant diffusion metric change was seen. This was characterized by higher FA and lower RD values (LL and SON) and a higher AD value (SON). SDS positively correlated with the TB AD. PTA showed a significant negative relationship with MD at the LL and a positive relationship with AD at the inferior colliculus (affected side). PTA also showed a significant negative relationship with RD and MD at the SON and TB, and a positive relationship with FA and AD at the MGB on the contralateral side (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This work outlines that quantitative DTI is a useful tool to evaluate the white matter microstructural alterations in the auditory neural pathway. Importantly, as a noninvasive tool, diffusion metrics can help in understanding the pathophysiology of hearing impairment in this group of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207