MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An exploratory analysis of hazardous substances registered in the Mexican Pollutant Releases and Transfers Register in the State of Tamaulipas

2025· article· en· W4415089351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hugo G. Reyes‐Anastacio, Jaqueline Calderón, María Esther Bautista-Vargas, Santiago Gómez-Carpizo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollutantHazardous wasteHazardous air pollutantsChristian ministryExploratory analysisAgency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The North American Free Trade Agreement required Mexico, the United States and Canada to measure pollutants released and transferred to the environment. In Mexico, the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources publishes an annual report of pollutants released or transferred by public and private facilities across industrial sectors. Each facility must report substances listed in Official Mexican Standard NOM-165-SEMARNAT-2013. In this study, we used the SINAT tool to obtain records of pollutant releases by municipalities in the state of Tamaulipas. We preprocessed and analysed the substances released in Tamaulipas and mapped them to their corresponding groups based on monographs from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). These groupings were then used to identify toxic substances—such as benzene, arsenic and asbestos—classified as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) in Tamaulipas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics.Same topicToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFrench-language works237,207