MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415092188 · doi:10.1123/jpah.2025-0589

The Around the Clock Terminology Consortium: A Global Consensus on Terminology to Discuss the 24-Hour Cycle of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep

2025· article· en· W4415092188 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan S. Falck, Kirk I. Erickson, Ester Cerin, Liye Zou, Ashleigh E. Smith, Francisco B. Ortega, Jennifer C. Davis, Jasper Schipperijn, Jannique van Uffelen, António L. Palmeira, Michelle W. Voss, David W. Dunstan, Linda Li, Jairo H. Migueles, Nucharapon Liangruenrom, Guilherme Moraes Balbim, Jennifer R. Tomasone, Matthew Ahmadi, Karen Spruyt, Frank Hookin Fu, Lora Giangregorio, Zhaowei Kong, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Jean‐Philippe Chaput, Miao Miao, Natan Feter, Keerthana Swaminathan, Robert J. Schinke, Yiqun Gan, Shigeru Inoue, Varadayini Gorhe, Takumi Abe, Maurelle D’Sa, Yu‐Kai Chang, Amy Shirong Lu, David R. Lubans, Åsa Tornberg, Teresa Liu‐Ambrose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Activity and Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of WaterlooCanadian Society for Exercise PhysiologyResearch CanadaQueen's UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminologySleep (system call)MEDLINEPhysical activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Around the Clock Terminology Consortium: A Global Consensus on Terminology to Discuss the 24-Hour Cycle of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Sleep

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.127
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.164
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1270.164
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.008
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0070.011
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0180.019
Research integrity0.0210.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical Activity and HealthSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207