Parcipatory Action Research to Develop Local Wisdom-Integrated Environmental Education Lessons for Primary Schools in Mangrove Communities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to (a) investigate the problems and needs related to integrating local wisdom into classroom instruction, (b) explore the processes and outcomes of environmental education in teacher self-development for this integration, and (c) analyze key factors contributing to the success of teachers in applying local wisdom in their teaching. Local wisdom, deeply rooted in Thai cultural identity, offers valuable knowledge and techniques passed down through generations. It also reflects unique local contexts and can be used to enrich the learning experience in a way that aligns with students’ lives and the surrounding environment. Teachers play a crucial role in raising students’ awareness of local wisdom by embedding it in school curricula. However, current efforts to promote this integration face challenges due to varying teacher capacities, insufficient training, and context-specific needs. This study adopted a qualitative approach to identify a practical model and key success factors for supporting teachers’ professional growth. The findings revealed that successful integration depends on teacher motivation, collaborative learning, institutional support, and the relevance of professional development models to local contexts. This study provides insights into designing effective strategies to enhance the capacity of teachers, especially those in rural or marginalized areas, to connect curriculum with community knowledge, thereby promoting meaningful learning and cultural sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it