MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415097695 · doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115645

Accelerated quantification of reinforcement degradation in additively manufactured Ni-WC metal matrix composites via SEM and vision transformers

2025· article· en· W4415097695 on OpenAlexafffund
Mutahar Safdar, Bashir Kazimi, Karina Ruzaeva, Gentry Wood, Max Zimmermann, Guy Lamouche, Priti Wanjara, Stefan Sandfeld, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Characterization · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsSegmentationScanning electron microscopeTransformerPattern recognition (psychology)ReinforcementDilutionMatrix (chemical analysis)Market segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning (ML) applications have shown potential in analyzing complex patterns in additively manufactured (AMed) structures. Metal matrix composites (MMC) offer the potential to enhance functional parts through a metal matrix and reinforcement particles. However, their processing can induce several co-existing anomalies in the microstructure, which are difficult to analyze through optical metallography. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) can better highlight the degradation of reinforcement particles, but the analysis can be labor-intensive, time-consuming, and highly dependent on expert knowledge. Deep learning-based semantic segmentation has the potential to expedite the analysis of SEM images and hence support their characterization in the industry. This capability is particularly desired for rapid and precise quantification of defect features from the SEM images. In this study, key state-of-the-art semantic segmentation methods from self-attention-based vision transformers (ViTs) are investigated for their segmentation performance on SEM images with a focus on segmenting defect pixels. Specifically, SegFormer, MaskFormer, Mask2Former, UPerNet, DPT, Segmenter, and SETR models were evaluated. A reference fully convolutional model, DeepLabV3+, widely used on semantic segmentation tasks, is also included in the comparison. A SEM dataset representing AMed MMCs was generated through extensive experimentation and is made available in this work. Our comparison shows that several transformer-based models perform better than the reference CNN model with UPerNet (94.33 % carbide dilution accuracy) and SegFormer (93.46 % carbide dilution accuracy) consistently outperformed the other models in segmenting damage to the carbide particles in the SEM images. The findings on the validation and test sets highlight the most frequent misclassification errors at the boundaries of defective and defect-free pixels. The models were also evaluated based on their prediction confidence as a practical measure to support decision-making and model selection. As a result, the UPerNet model with the Swin backbone is recommended for segmenting SEM images from AMed MMCs in scenarios where accuracy and robustness are desired whereas the SegFormer model is recommended for its lighter design and competitive performance. In the future, the analysis can be extended by including higher capacity as well as smaller models in the comparison. Similarly, variations in specific hyperparameters can be investigated to reinforce the rationale of selecting a specific configuration. • Damaged carbide phases are identified from scanning electron microscopy to assess thermal effects during processing. • A deep learning framework is developed to segment and quantify reinforcement degradation in metal matrix composites. • Predicted segmentations closely match expert labels, confirming the model's accuracy across microstructural classes. • Transformer-based models show better performance than conventional methods in identifying degraded carbide regions. • A labeled dataset of microscopy images is provided to support further research on automated microstructural analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials CharacterizationSame topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207