Sustainable solutions: the role of gel-based adsorbents in CO₂ capture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review examines the potential of novel gel-based adsorbents as effective solutions for capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) amid rising global emissions. Addressing the urgent need for sustainable and energy-efficient adsorption technologies, the article highlights the unique characteristics of various gel-based adsorbents, particularly those derived from renewable resources. These materials exhibit advantageous three-dimensional structures that enhance high-capacity and energy-efficient CO2 capture. Key features include a porous three-dimensional structure and tunable viscoelastic properties that contribute to significant adsorption capacity, selectivity, and optimised energy recovery. Additionally, the review analyzes the design and performance of the latest generations of sustainable gel adsorbents, often integrated with nanomaterials, ionic liquids, or biosurfactants, demonstrating the synergistic effects of these combinations on performance enhancement. Recent advances in carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS) technologies related to these adsorbents are examined. The economic and environmental benefits of hybrid systems were outlined, emphasising their inherent sustainability and essential role in the transition to a low-carbon economy. Finally, future research directions focused on optimising gel structures were proposed to enhance scalability and efficiency, a crucial step in facilitating sustainable development and strengthening climate resilience in the face of ongoing environmental challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it