MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415114110 · doi:10.18280/jesa.580805

Novel Nonlinear PI Controller Using Metaheuristic Algorithms for Speed Control of Wind Turbine Systems

2025· article· fr· W4415114110 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marwa Arabi, Youcef Zennir, Hichem Bounezour, M. Benghanem, José Manuel Pastor García, Mohammed Wadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIslamic University of Madinah
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TurbineNonlinear systemController (irrigation)PID controllerElectronic speed controlControl systemWind speed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind turbines operate under highly dynamic conditions influenced by unpredictable wind profiles and external disturbances.The nonlinear characteristics of their dynamic models further complicate their modeling and control.This research focuses on optimizing the power output of a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) equipped with a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG).To achieve this, a Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) strategy is developed, integrating an innovative nonlinear PI controller.The parameters of this controller are fine-tuned using advanced meta-heuristic optimization techniques, including Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO), and Golden Jackal Optimization (GJO).Simulation results highlight the superior performance of the GJO-NLPI controller, demonstrating exceptional accuracy and rapid response in regulating mechanical rotation speed, while effectively reducing overshoot.The proposed control architecture showcases significant advancements in power extraction efficiency and dynamic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207