Emotion Manipulation for Talking-Head Videos via Facial Landmarks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Manipulating the emotion of a performer in a video is a challenging task. The lip motion needs to be preserved while performing the desired changes in the emotion of the subject; however, simply utilizing existing image-based editing methods sabotages the original lip synchronization. We tackle this problem by utilizing a pretrained StyleGAN paired with a landmark-based editing module that modifies the bias present in the edit direction used in image manipulation. The proposed editing module consists of a latent-based landmark detection network and an editing network that modifies the editing direction to match the original lip synchronization while preserving the desired emotion manipulation results. This is realized by taking the facial landmarks as control points. Both networks operate on the latent space, which enables fast training and inference. We show that the proposed method runs significantly faster and performs better in terms of visual quality than alternative approaches, which was validated through a perceptual study. The proposed method can also be extended to perform face reenactment to generate a talking-head video from a single image and face image manipulation using facial landmarks as control points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it