Thermal Side-Channel Threats in Densely Integrated Microarchitectures: A Comprehensive Review for Cyber–Physical System Security
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Densely integrated microarchitectures spanning three-dimensional integrated circuits (3D-ICs), chiplet-based designs, and system-in-package (SiP) assemblies make heat a first-order security concern rather than a mere reliability issue. This review consolidates the landscape of thermal side-channel attacks (TSCAs) on densely integrated microarchitectures: we systematize observation vectors and threat models, clarify core concepts and assumptions, compare the most credible evidence from the past decade, and distill the main classes of defenses across the hardware-software stack. We also explain why hardening against thermal leakage is integral to cyber-physical system (CPS) security and outline the most promising research directions for the field. The strategic relevance of this agenda is reflected in current policy and funding momentum, including initiatives by the United States Department of Homeland Security and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (DHS/CISA) on operational technology (OT) security, programs by the National Science Foundation (NSF) on CPS, and Canada's Regional Artificial Intelligence Initiative and Cyber-Physical Resilience Program (RAII, >CAD 35 million), to bridge advanced microelectronics with next-generation cybersecurity. This survey offers a clear, high-level map of the problem space and a focused baseline for future work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".