MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415120081 · doi:10.63824/jptsp.v12i2.335

PERANCANGAN SKEMA BANK AIR KALI BABEN UNTUK MENDUKUNG KEBUTUHAN AIR BERSIH DI PERUMAHAN PANCA ARGA AKMIL MAGELANG

2025· article· id· W4415120081 on OpenAlexaff
Fierman Sjafirial Agustus, Agung Prapsetyo, Sudirman Indra, Yuwono Yuwono

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL PERTAHANAN · 2025
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater and Land Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKaliOpen airPanca

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perubahan iklim dan pertumbuhan penduduk telah meningkatkan tekanan terhadap ketersediaan air bersih, termasuk di kawasan Perumahan Panca Arga I Akmil Magelang. Perumahan Panca Arga dilalui jaringan irigasi Progo Manggis, yang dikenal dengan nama Kali Baben, akan tetapi belum dimanfaatkan untuk mendukung kebutuhan air bersih bagi warga perumahan. Salah satu bentuk pemanfaatan Kali Baben sebagai solusi inovatif untuk meningkatkan ketahanan air adalah dengan pengembangan “bank air”, yaitu sistem pengelolaan air berbasis pemanfaatan air Kali Baben untuk disalurkan, difilterisasi/disaring dan diendapkan kemudian diinjeksikan dan disimpan ke dalam tanah secara alami sebagai cadangan air tanah pada akuifer. Penelitian ini bertujuan merancang dan menguji sistem bank air berbasis Kali Baben dengan teknologi sederhana untuk meningkatkan ketersediaan air bersih bagi Perumahan Panca Arga dan memenuhi standar higiens Depkes RI. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode campuran diawali dengan mendesain Sistem Bank Air, mengimplementasikan dan menilai kualitas air yang dihasilkan, serta wawancara dengan penggagas bank air tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa desain skema bank air Kali Baben mampu secara efektif menyimpan air tanah tanpa mengurangi secara signifikan kuantitas aliran air Kali Baben. Skema bank air perumahan Panca Arga secara kualitas menghasilkan air yang memenuhi standar kualitas air bersih higiens Depkes RI

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL PERTAHANANSame topicWater and Land ManagementFrench-language works237,207