PEMBANGUNAN RUMAH TAHAN GEMPA METODE IN SITU PASCA BENCANA GEMPA BUMI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fungsi konstruksi sebagai salah satu domain kemampuan Satgas PRCPB Yonzipur 9/LLB diharapkan siap operasional setiap saat guna membantu mempertinggi kelangsungan hidup pasukan kawan maupun warga terdampak bencana, khususnya melalui pembangunan Rumah Tahan Gempa dengan jenis RUSPIN dan RUMBAKO. Pendekatan deskriptif naratif dan teknik studi literatur digunakan melalui pengumpulan data observasi, wawancara dan dokumentasi guna membahas konsep RTG RUSPIN dan RUMBAKO, kuantitas dan kualitas serta hambatan dan tantangan. Konsep RTG RUSPIN dan RUMBAKO direkomendasikan oleh pemerintah sebagai bentuk pembangunan kembali perumahan secara in-situ dan telah dirancang memenuhi standar persyaratan bangunan tahan gempa. Secara kuantitas RTG RUMBAKO selesai 8.456 unit dan RTG RUSPIN sejumlah 11.802 unit, penurunan kualitas tercatat pada elemen nonstruktural serta adanya pihak ketiga menyebabkan terjadinya tumpang tindih pekerjaan dalam pelaksanaan pembangunan. Hambatan yang menjadi tantangan berupa terbatasnya akses jalan menuju lokasi sasaran, keterbatasan materiil dan alat berat, keterbatasan komunikasi antara Satgas, instansi terkait, dan pihak ketiga, serta waktu pelaksanaan terbatas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".