Gender pronouns, duties of care, and queer and trans survival: A CRT counterstory of academic drag, teaching queer, and pedagogies of hope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a Critical Race Theory (CRT) counterstory in both method and genre, this article critically reflects on and qualitatively annotates transcripts from the 2024 Waterloo Staff Conference presentation “Gender Pronouns, Duties of Care, and Queer and Trans Survival.” Counterstory allows the authors to maintain the vibrancy and authenticity of the live, hybrid session in preserving the original orality now in prose while also connecting to and embodying the special issue’s themes and foci. The talk was part of UWaterloo’s commitment to (re)creating safe(r) campus spaces following a former-student’s gender-based terrorist attack of a Gender and Social Justice professor and students in June 2023. The talk itself, hosted by an academic drag queen alumn, showcased gender pronouns and higher education professionals’ responsibilities to increasingly ensure that our campuses are life-giving, not life-taking, for our students, for ourselves, and for each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".