Cooperative Digital Twin-Enhanced UAV Topology Optimization for Multi-Target Tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles-based Multiple Targets Tracking (UAV-MTT) has been mainstream in serving mission-critical scenarios for public safety, such as hit-and-run tracking and border patrol. Nonetheless, it is challenging to implement high-efficiency UAV topology control due to the variable moving speeds of targets and the limited sensing and communication resources of UAVs. To address the problem, we propose a terminal-edge cooperative Digital Twin (DT) framework for real-time and accurate MTT. Based on the DT technology, we achieve joint optimization of local and global UAV topologies to track targets with diverse speeds. Explicitly, we construct time-spatial DT models based on temporal and spatial information of targets and UAVs. The DT models can instruct UAVs to dynamically adjust position relations among one-hop neighbors for local topology optimization using our proposed Time Spatial Graph Learning based DT (TSGL-DT) algorithm. UAVs can use the optimization results to invite feasible neighbors to track low-speed moving targets. Our DT models can also allocate feasible UAVs to connect suitable local topologies for global topology optimization. It can achieve cooperative MTT to track high-speed moving targets. The experiment results demonstrate that our solution reduces the MTT latency by 41.2% while improving the successful tracking ratio delivery ratio by 15.6% on average compared to state-of-the-art benchmarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".