U-Net-Based Deep Learning for Simultaneous Segmentation and Agenesis Detection of Primary and Permanent Teeth in Panoramic Radiographs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Panoramic radiographs aid diagnosis in paediatric dentistry, but errors occur. Deep learning-based artificial intelligence offers improved accuracy by reducing overlap-related and interpretive mistakes. This study aimed to develop a U-Net-based deep learning model for simultaneous tooth segmentation and agenesis detection, capable of distinguishing between primary and permanent teeth in panoramic radiographs. Methods: Publicly available panoramic radiographs, along with images collected from the archives of Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Faculty of Dentistry, were used. The dataset totalled 1697 panoramic radiographs after applying exclusion criteria for artifacts and edentulous cases. Manual segmentation was performed by two paediatric dentists and one dentomaxillofacial radiologist. The images were split into training (80%), validation (10%), and test (10%) sets. A U-Net architecture was trained to identify both primary and permanent teeth and to detect tooth agenesis. Results: Dental agenesis was detected in 14.6% of 1697 OPGs, predominantly affecting the mandibular second premolars (32.5%) and maxillary lateral incisors (27.6%). Intra- and inter-researcher intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.995 and 0.990, respectively (p > 0.05). On the test set, the model achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.8773, precision of 0.9115, recall of 0.8974, and an F1 score of 0.9027. Validation accuracy was 96.71%, indicating reliable performance across diverse datasets. Conclusions: The proposed deep learning model automates tooth segmentation and agenesis detection for both primary and permanent dentitions in panoramic radiographs. Its high-performance metrics suggest improved accuracy and efficiency in paediatric dental diagnostics, potentially reducing clinician workload and minimizing diagnostic errors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".