Evaluating the Performance of Winter Wheat Under Late Sowing Using UAV Multispectral Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the lower and middle sections of the Yangtze River Basin Region (YRBR) in China, challenges posed by climate change and delayed harvesting of preceding crops have hindered the timely sowing of wheat, leading to an increasing prevalence of late-sown wheat fields. This trend has emerged as a significant impediment to achieving high and stable production of wheat in this area. During the growing seasons of 2022–2023 and 2023–2024, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based multispectral camera was used to monitor different wheat materials at various growth stages under normal sowing treatment (M1) and late sowing with increased plant density (M2). By assessing yield loss, the wheat tolerance to late sowing was quantified and categorized. The correlation between the differential vegetation indices (D-VIs) and late sowing resistance was examined. The findings revealed that the J2-Logistic model demonstrated optimal classification performance. The precision values of stable type, intermediate type, and sensitive type were 0.92, 0.61, and 1.00, respectively. The recall values were 0.61, 0.92, and 1.00. The mean average precision (mAP) of the model was 0.92. This study proposes a high-throughput and low-cost evaluation method for wheat tolerance to late sowing, which can provide a rapid predictive tool for screening suitable varieties for late sowing and facilitating late-sown wheat breeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".