Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although Kolář’s Prometheus’s Liver ranks among the most important works of 20th-century Czech literature, the story of its publication stands as a grim testament to the dominance of ideological interference over respect for cultural values during the totalitarian regime in Czechoslovakia. Not only could it not be published at the time of its creation in 1950, but even twenty years later, in 1970, it was pulped. A samizdat edition released in 1985 by Josef Škvorecký’s Toronto-based exile publishing house ’68 Publishers restricted its circulation primarily to readers in exile. Given Kolář’s concern for the state of society and its moral values, one may assume that the artistic conception of both editions was shaped by the historical context in which they were produced. In this article, I investigate how Kolář, by means of specific artistic appropriations, updated the 1950 text in relation first to the societal crisis that characterised the late 1960s following the events of August 1968, and then again in the early 1980s, amidst the intensifying pressures of normalisation, culminating in 1983 when Kolář completed the collages for the Toronto edition. The concept of the artwork accompanying the cancelled 1970s edition emerged on the threshold of normalisation, under time constraints, which is why some of the collages selected were not created specifically for the book. This version is visually less cohesive; however, the prominent placement of a Boschian collage clearly signals the work’s apocalyptic foundation. Kolář prepared the Toronto edition while in exile in Paris. Meanwhile, his wife was in protracted negotiations with Prague’s nomenclature bureaucrats concerning the fate of Kolář’s work and collections. These circumstances, too, left their mark on the collages. His appropriation of fragments of Bosch’s Christ Carrying the Cross and five biblical illustrations by Gustave Doré, whose subject matter the artist deliberately withholds, confirms the text as an angry biblical poem. The thematic compactness of the collages, concentrated into a unified, minimalist form, employs an anonymised array of motifs and brief literary commentaries to update the text and to articulate a response to the ever-present forces of aggression and cultural degradation. Kolář’s heightened scepticism represents a bleak commentary on the collapse of values in the early 1980s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".