MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415150354 · doi:10.3390/jimaging11100360

Lung Nodule Malignancy Classification Integrating Deep and Radiomic Features in a Three-Way Attention-Based Fusion Module

2025· article· en· W4415150354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningConvolutional neural networkEncoderFeature extractionMalignancyAdenocarcinomaAtypical adenomatous hyperplasia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we propose a novel hybrid framework for assessing the invasiveness of an in-house dataset of 114 pathologically proven lung adenocarcinomas presenting as subsolid nodules on Computed Tomography (CT). Nodules were classified into group 1 (G1), which included atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, and group 2 (G2), which included invasive adenocarcinomas. Our approach includes a three-way Integration of Visual, Spatial, and Temporal features with Attention, referred to as I-VISTA, obtained from three processing algorithms designed based on Deep Learning (DL) and radiomic models, leading to a more comprehensive analysis of nodule variations. The aforementioned processing algorithms are arranged in the following three parallel paths: (i) The Shifted Window (SWin) Transformer path, which is a hierarchical vision Transformer that extracts nodules' related spatial features; (ii) The Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE) Transformer path, which captures informative features related to inter-slice relations via a modified Transformer encoder architecture; and (iii) a 3D Radiomic-based path that collects quantitative features based on texture analysis of each nodule. Extracted feature sets are then passed through the Criss-Cross attention fusion module to discover the most informative feature patterns and classify nodules type. The experiments were evaluated based on a ten-fold cross-validation scheme. I-VISTA framework achieved the best performance of overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity (mean ± std) of 93.93 ± 6.80%, 92.66 ± 9.04%, and 94.99 ± 7.63% with an Area under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 0.93 ± 0.08 for lung nodule classification among ten folds. The hybrid framework integrating DL and hand-crafted 3D Radiomic model outperformed the standalone DL and hand-crafted 3D Radiomic model in differentiating G1 from G2 subsolid nodules identified on CT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it