MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415151652 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-4174

Passive acoustic monitoring from profiling floats as a pathway to scalable autonomous observations of global surface wind

2025· article· en· W4415151652 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Delaigue, Pierre Cauchy, Dorian Cazau, Julien Bonnel, Sara Pensieri, Roberto Bozzano, Anatole Gros-Martial, Christophe Schaeffer, Arnaud David, Paco Stil, Antoine Poteau, Catherine Schmechtig, Édouard Leymarie, Hervé Claustre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersHorizon 2020European Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsHORIZON EUROPE Research InfrastructuresCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean CommissionAgence Nationale de la RechercheInstitut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la MerNorthwestern University
KeywordsBuoyWind speedProfiling (computer programming)Software deploymentAmbient noise levelWind powerResidual

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Wind forcing plays a pivotal role in driving upper-ocean physical and biogeochemical processes, yet direct wind observations remain sparse in many regions of the global ocean. While passive acoustic techniques have been used to estimate wind speed from moored and mobile platforms, their application to profiling floats has been demonstrated only in limited cases and remains largely unexplored. Here, we report on the first deployment of a profiling float equipped with a passive acoustic sensor, aimed at detecting wind-driven surface signals from depth. The float was deployed in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea near the DYFAMED meteorological buoy from February to April 2025, operating at parking depths of 500–1000 m. We demonstrate that wind speed can be successfully retrieved from subsurface ambient noise using established acoustic algorithms, with float-derived estimates showing good agreement with collocated surface observations from the DYFAMED buoy. To evaluate the potential for broader application, we simulate a remote deployment scenario by refitting the acoustic model of Nystuen et al. (2015) using ERA5 reanalysis as a proxy for surface wind. Refitting the model to ERA5 data demonstrates that the float–acoustic–wind relationship is generalizable in moderate conditions, but high-wind regimes remain systematically biased—especially above 10 m s-1. Finally, we apply a residual learning framework to correct these estimates using a limited subset of DYFAMED wind data, simulating conditions where only brief surface observations—such as those from a ship during float deployment—are available. The corrected wind time series achieved a 37 % reduction in RMSE and improved the coefficient of determination (R2) from 0.85 to 0.91, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining reanalysis with sparse in-situ fitting. This framework enables the retrieval of fine-scale wind variability not captured by reanalysis alone, supporting a scalable strategy for float-based wind monitoring in data-sparse ocean regions—with important implications for quantifying air–sea exchanges, improving biogeochemical flux estimates, and advancing global climate observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→