Passive acoustic monitoring from profiling floats as a pathway to scalable autonomous observations of global surface wind
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Wind forcing plays a pivotal role in driving upper-ocean physical and biogeochemical processes, yet direct wind observations remain sparse in many regions of the global ocean. While passive acoustic techniques have been used to estimate wind speed from moored and mobile platforms, their application to profiling floats has been demonstrated only in limited cases and remains largely unexplored. Here, we report on the first deployment of a profiling float equipped with a passive acoustic sensor, aimed at detecting wind-driven surface signals from depth. The float was deployed in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea near the DYFAMED meteorological buoy from February to April 2025, operating at parking depths of 500–1000 m. We demonstrate that wind speed can be successfully retrieved from subsurface ambient noise using established acoustic algorithms, with float-derived estimates showing good agreement with collocated surface observations from the DYFAMED buoy. To evaluate the potential for broader application, we simulate a remote deployment scenario by refitting the acoustic model of Nystuen et al. (2015) using ERA5 reanalysis as a proxy for surface wind. Refitting the model to ERA5 data demonstrates that the float–acoustic–wind relationship is generalizable in moderate conditions, but high-wind regimes remain systematically biased—especially above 10 m s-1. Finally, we apply a residual learning framework to correct these estimates using a limited subset of DYFAMED wind data, simulating conditions where only brief surface observations—such as those from a ship during float deployment—are available. The corrected wind time series achieved a 37 % reduction in RMSE and improved the coefficient of determination (R2) from 0.85 to 0.91, demonstrating the effectiveness of combining reanalysis with sparse in-situ fitting. This framework enables the retrieval of fine-scale wind variability not captured by reanalysis alone, supporting a scalable strategy for float-based wind monitoring in data-sparse ocean regions—with important implications for quantifying air–sea exchanges, improving biogeochemical flux estimates, and advancing global climate observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".