The X-ray statistical properties of dust-obscured galaxies detected by eROSITA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Context. The tight correlation between supermassive black hole (SMBH) and host galaxy masses suggests their coevolution. Dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) are thought to represent this coevolution phase, with active galactic nuclei (AGNs) buried in dust and gas. Despite hosting rapidly growing SMBHs, the X-ray statistical properties of DOGs remain poorly understood due to their rarity and the lack of wide, uniformly sensitive X-ray surveys. Aims. We construct a sample of X-ray-detected DOGs in the eROSITA Final Equatorial Depth Survey (eFEDS) field and examine their X-ray statistical properties. Methods. To construct the DOGs sample, we combined data from the Subaru/HSC SSP (optical), VIKING (near-infrared), and WISE (mid-infrared) all-sky surveys. We then cross-matched the sample with eROSITA -detected sources to select X-ray-detected DOGs. Results. We report the discovery of 5738 IR-bright DOGs within the 60 deg 2 area covered by both eFEDS and VIKING, including 65 X-ray-detected DOGs (eFEDS-DOGs). Among these, 41 eFEDS-DOGs exhibit a near- to mid-IR power-law slope, indicating dust-obscured AGNs. Hydrogen column densities ( N H ) of eFEDS-DOGs span 10 20 < N H /cm −2 ≲ 10 23 , including even unobscured AGNs. Most IR-bright DOGs remain undetected in X-rays, implying heavy obscuration ( N H /cm −2 > 10 23 ). eFEDS-DOGs, identified via the wide-area eROSITA survey, represent a less obscured DOG phase, possibly tracing the decline of dust/gas obscuration due to AGN feedback such as gas stripping or outflows. Some eFEDS-DOGs deviate up to ∼1 dex below the L 6 μm – L 0.5 − 2 keV (abs, corr) relation, potentially indicating high Eddington ratios near the Eddington limit. This suggests that eFEDS-DOGs are promising candidates for rapidly growing black holes in an early AGN feedback phase.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Astronomy study of the X-ray properties of dust-obscured galaxies in eROSITA data.
It studies the X-ray properties of dust-obscured galaxies, not research itself.
Astronomy study of X-ray properties of dust-obscured galaxies; domain astrophysics.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".