A deep learning-based framework for standardized analysis of trabecular bone compartments from micro-CT imaging data in the mouse tibia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding bone remodeling and disease progression is crucial in preclinical skeletal research, particularly for assessing pharmacological and mechanical interventions in the long bones of murine models. High-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging enables detailed trabecular bone analysis; however, inconsistent and non-standardized definitions of the volumes of interest (VOIs) across the different trabecular compartments compromise reproducibility and may lead to misleading statistical interpretations. In this study, we introduce a deep learning framework for automated trabecular bone analysis from micro-CT scans (5 µm voxel size) of the epiphyseal-metaphyseal region in the mouse tibia. The epiphyseal-metaphyseal region is classified into four anatomical compartments, epiphyseal bone, growth plate, primary spongiosa, and secondary spongiosa, using a 2D slice-wise classification model combined with a regional probability distribution method to detect the transitional landmarks between these compartments and enable standardized VOI extraction. To validate our method, we trained and tested the model on three micro-CT datasets comprising a total of 40 bone scans, each annotated by three experts to assess inter- and intra-operator variability, and further assessed its generalizability using an additional external dataset. These datasets encompassed diverse experimental conditions, including pharmacological treatments, mechanical loading, and age-related reduced bone density. Our classification model achieved excellent performances (mean F1-score of 0.96 for the epiphyseal bone, 0.95 for the growth plate, 0.92 for the primary spongiosa, and 0.99 for the secondary spongiosa across all datasets; statistical equivalence within 0.05 mm, [Formula: see text]) and demonstrated strong generalizability on the external dataset (mean F1-score of 0.99 for the epiphyseal bone, 0.97 for the growth plate, 0.92 for the primary spongiosa, and 1.0 for the secondary spongiosa; statistical equivalence within 0.05 mm, [Formula: see text]). Following the extraction of the different trabecular compartments, we segmented the trabecular bone within the epiphyseal bone, primary spongiosa, and secondary spongiosa using a deep learning-based segmentation model. We performed a comprehensive morphological and statistical analysis of all trabecular compartments in the mouse tibia, facilitating consistent comparisons across experimental groups and enabling direct comparisons within and between trabecular compartments. This automated method provides a consistent and robust tool for analyzing micro-CT scans of the trabecular bone in the mouse tibia, facilitating advancements in preclinical skeletal research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".