MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415159186 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3621156

Null-Space Based Design With Learning for RIS-Aided Wireless Information and Power Transfer

2025· article· en· W4415159186 on OpenAlexafffund
Zina Mohamed, Sonia Aı̈ssa, Ammar B. Kouki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBenchmark (surveying)WirelessMaximum power transfer theoremBenchmarkingTransmission (telecommunications)Data transmissionChannel (broadcasting)Optimization problemInformation transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a novel concept for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) aided simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). The concept leverages, for the first time, the degrees of freedom provided by the null-space of the channel between the access point and the information receivers (IRs) through the RIS to send an additional energy signal to the energy receivers (ERs), simultaneously with the data transmission to the IRs. As with any new concept, the first step must be to validate it and assess its advantages and potential limitations in a typical wireless system composed of a multi-antenna transmitter, multiple IRs and ERs, and a RIS of varying dimensions. The paper does exactly this by designing a SWIPT system where the proposed null-space-based (NSB) approach is implemented. This design is then used to quantify the performance of the new approach and benchmark it against prior art. In this regard, we seek to maximize the ERs' harvested power and the IRs' data rate in the designed SWIPT system, which results in a multi-objective optimization problem proper to our NSB approach. To address this optimization problem, we propose and implement two solution approaches: one leveraging the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) method, and the other utilizing alternating optimization (AO). We compare both solutions in terms of system performance, showing that the DDPG consistently outperforms the AO by 2–3% in all tested cases. Additionally, benchmarking against state-of-the-art approaches demonstrates that the proposed NSB SWIPT design outperforms existing SWIPT benchmarks by 15–20%, both with and without RIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207