MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415166818 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-25-0875

Investigating the Causal Effect of Potential Therapeutic Agents for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2025· article· en· W4415166818 on OpenAlexaff
E Fryer, D. Timothy Bishop, Peter T. Campbell, Andrew T. Chan, Loı̈c Le Marchand, Christopher I. Li, Vı́ctor Moreno, Marc J. Gunter, Amanda I. Phipps, Robert C. Grant, Stephanie L. Schmit, Richard M. Martin, James Yarmolinsky, Philip Haycock

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNIHR Bristol Biomedical Research CentreCancer Research UKWellcome Trust
KeywordsMendelian randomizationColorectal cancerCancerRandomizationProstate cancerClinical trialMendelian inheritance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Conventional observational studies have identified several potential therapeutic agents that may lower the risk of colorectal cancer development. However, these studies are susceptible to unmeasured and residual confounding and reverse causation, undermining robust causal inference. METHODS: We used Mendelian randomization, a genetic epidemiologic method that can strengthen causal inference, to evaluate the effect of previously reported therapeutic agents on colorectal cancer risk, including medications, dietary micronutrients, and exogenous hormones. Genetic instruments were constructed using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of molecular traits (e.g., circulating levels of protein drug targets, blood-based biomarkers of micronutrients, and circulating levels of endogenous hormones). Using summary statistics from these GWASs and a colorectal cancer risk GWAS (cases = 78,473; controls = 107,143), we employed Wald ratios and inverse-variance weighted models to estimate causal effects. RESULTS: We found evidence for associations of genetically proxied elevated omega-3 fatty acids (OR = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.18; P = 6.20 × 10-3) and reduced plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels (OR = 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.13; P = 9.36 × 10-4) with colorectal cancer risk. Findings for ACE inhibition were consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced plasma ACE levels were robustly linked to increased colorectal cancer risk. Further work is required to better understand the mechanism behind this finding and whether this translates to adverse effects via medication use (i.e., ACE inhibitors). IMPACT: These findings provide updated evidence on the role of previously reported therapeutic agents in colorectal cancer risk, helping prioritize further evaluation of those agents with potential etiologic roles in cancer development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.129
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.252
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1290.252
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.008
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207