La laïcité québécoise a-t-elle été malade de la COVID-19?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Alors que la constitutionnalité de la Loi sur la laïcité de l’État était contestée devant la Cour supérieure du Québec, détournant les regards pour les orienter vers la question du port de symboles religieux dans la fonction publique, se jouait un autre enjeu de laïcité sur un terrain inattendu. Les politiques gouvernementales de gestion de la pandémie de COVID-19 allaient en effet mettre à l’épreuve deux principes aux fondements de la laïcité québécoise – la séparation des Églises et de l’État ; la liberté de conscience et de religion –, sans que ces atteintes ne soient diagnostiquées comme telles. Cet article se penche sur cet impensé des débats récents sur la laïcité québécoise à partir d’un rappel de ses fondements historico-juridiques, puis d’une analyse des effets du dispositif juridique mis en place pour lutter contre la COVID-19 sur l’autonomisation de l’État à l’égard du religieux et la liberté de conscience et de religion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".