MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415169422 · doi:10.3390/pr13103252

Study on Lower Limb Motion Intention Recognition Based on PO-SVMD-ResNet-GRU

2025· article· en· W4415169422 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Li, Mingsen Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology of Jilin Province
KeywordsThresholdingPattern recognition (psychology)Mean squared errorElectromyographyGaitHilbert–Huang transformWaveletNoise reductionResidual

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to enhance the accuracy of human lower limb motion intention recognition based on surface electromyography (sEMG) signals and proposes a signal denoising method based on Sequential Variational Mode Decomposition (SVMD) optimized by the Parrot Optimization (PO) algorithm and a joint motion angle prediction model combining Residual Network (ResNet) with Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) for the two aspects of signal processing and predictive modeling, respectively. First, for the two motion conditions of level walking and stair climbing, sEMG signals from the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris, as well as the motion angles of the hip and knee joints, were simultaneously collected from five healthy subjects, yielding a total of 400 gait cycle data points. The sEMG signals were denoised using the method combining PO-SVMD with wavelet thresholding. Compared with denoising methods such as Empirical Mode Decomposition, Partial Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition, Independent Component Analysis, and wavelet thresholding alone, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the proposed method was increased to a maximum of 23.42 dB. Then, the gait cycle information was divided into training and testing sets at a 4:1 ratio, and five models—ResNet-GRU, Transformer-LSTM, CNN-GRU, ResNet, and GRU—were trained and tested individually using the processed sEMG signals as input and the hip and knee joint movement angles as output. Finally, the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2) were used as evaluation metrics for the test results. The results show that for both motion conditions, the evaluation metrics of the ResNet-GRU model in the test results are superior to those of the other four models. The optimal evaluation metrics for level walking are 2.512 ± 0.415°, 1.863 ± 0.265°, and 0.979 ± 0.007, respectively, while the optimal evaluation metrics for stair climbing are 2.475 ± 0.442°, 2.012 ± 0.336°, and 0.98 ± 0.009, respectively. The method proposed in this study achieves improvements in both signal processing and predictive modeling, providing a new method for research on lower limb motion intention recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcessesSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207