Nanomaterial-assisted immunodiagnostic profiling and therapeutic targeting of hepatocellular carcinoma: from molecular biomarkers to clinical applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims and objectives: This study aimed to identify immunologically relevant transcriptomic and proteomic biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to characterize their B-cell epitopes for potential integration into nanomaterial-based biosensors and immunomodulatory platforms for early diagnosis and targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive multi-omics analysis by integrating transcriptomic (TCGA-LIHC) and proteomic data to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in HCC. Protein-protein interaction networks and pathway enrichment were used to prioritize hub genes. Five candidate biomarkers, RFC2, HSP90AB1, YWHAZ, CYP2E1, and ADH4, were selected for qRT-PCR and serum ELISA validation in clinical cohorts comprising 85 HCC patients and 50 healthy controls. B-cell epitope prediction was performed using BepiPred 2.0 and validated through synthetic peptide-based ELISA in the same cohort to assess immunoreactivity. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC curve analysis. Results: RFC2, HSP90AB1, and YWHAZ were significantly upregulated (|log2FC|>0.2) and showed high serological expression, whereas CYP2E1 and ADH4 were consistently downregulated. Predicted B-cell epitopes from RFC2, HSP90AB1, and YWHAZ exhibited strong immunoreactivity (AUC>0.84), indicating their diagnostic potential. Enrichment analysis revealed that upregulated DEGs were involved in cell cycle and mitotic progression, while downregulated genes were linked to immune suppression and metabolic dysfunction. These validated immunogenic epitopes offer promising anchors for nanomaterial-functionalized biosensors, such as gold nanoparticle-conjugated ELISA, graphene-based electrochemical platforms, and peptide-coated quantum dots, for ultrasensitive and multiplexed HCC detection. Conclusion: By integrating transcriptomic and proteomic screening with epitope-level validation, we identified a novel panel of immunogenic biomarkers suitable for nanomaterial-enabled diagnostics in HCC. These findings support the translational potential of peptide-nano scaffold conjugates in developing minimally invasive, immune-responsive biosensing and therapeutic tools tailored for early-stage liver cancer management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".