MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415177412 · doi:10.31046/ddbb2k57

Learn More About the Atla Board and its Work

2025· article· en· W4415177412 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Ebertz, Karl Stutzman

Bibliographic record

VenueATLA Summary of Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEgo Development and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Work (physics)Corporate governanceActive listeningOn board

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Atla Board of Directors is responsible for guiding the strategic direction of Atla and ensuring that it meets the needs of its members. Rather than transcribing what was a largely informal question-and-answer and listening session, this article highlights the primary concerns, structural processes, and relationship-building efforts that characterize the Board’s governance model. The session provided insights into the Board’s composition, the concerns of both Board members and the general membership, and the Board’s engagement strategies to strengthen relationships and ensure effective governance. The session also offered an opportunity for Board members to gather feedback from constituent members, known as the “moral owners.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueATLA Summary of ProceedingsSame topicEgo Development and Educational PracticesFrench-language works237,207