Complement Factor H and its <i>C. elegans</i> homolog regulate IFT52/OSM-6 and CNG channel localization in sensory neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in the elderly, is characterized by progressive degeneration of retinal photoreceptors. Current disease models propose AMD pathogenesis is a consequence of cytolytic damage and tissue inflammation that result from defective repression of alternative complement pathway activity by complement factor H (CFH). However, recent studies demonstrate functions for CFH that are outside of its established role in the alternative complement pathway, suggesting that novel CFH-mediated mechanisms may influence AMD initiation and progression. Our previous demonstration that CFH and its nematode homolog, CFH-1, modulate inversin/NPHP-2 accumulation in vertebrate photoreceptor and C. elegans sensory neuron cilia during aging suggests that AMD patients with CFH loss-of-function mutations have cilia defects that may contribute to photoreceptor dysfunction. Here, we investigate the consequences of CFH and CFH-1 loss-of-function mutations on the dynamics and localization of intraflagellar transport (IFT) train and visual cycle components in these cells. In C. elegans sensory neurons, IFTB1 components IFT52/OSM-6 and IFT88/OSM-5 are transported at similar rates in WT animals but IFT52/OSM-6 transport slows significantly in cfh-1 mutant animals while IFT88/OSM-5 is unaffected. Defective localization of IFT52/OSM-6 in photoreceptors of CFH knockout mice and in human photoreceptors from AMD high-risk CFH Y402H homozygotes, suggest an evolutionarily conserved role for CFH in promoting IFT52/OSM-6 transport and localization in sensory neuron cilia. In addition, distribution of CNG channel subunits in C. elegans cfh-1 mutant sensory neurons and CFH Y402H high-risk human photoreceptors are distinct from their WT and Y402 low-risk counterparts. Together, the data indicate previously unappreciated functions for CFH in IFT train organization and cilia protein localization and suggest a novel mechanism for photoreceptor segment thinning, an early AMD biomarker that has been linked to CFH high-risk variants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".